Monday, October 24, 2016

If You Bought An Apple Charger On Amazon It's Probably Fake And Might Catch Fire

The majority of Apple chargers sold on Amazon are counterfeits and some have the potential to overheat and catch fire, Apple alleges in a lawsuit filed against a New Jersey company that sells the chargers.

The majority of Apple chargers sold on Amazon are counterfeits and some have the potential to overheat and catch fire, Apple alleges in a lawsuit filed against a New Jersey company that sells the chargers.

AP/Kiichiro Sato

As part of an ongoing battle against counterfeit products, Apple purchased a number of power products — adapters and charging and syncing cables — from Amazon and determined that they were counterfeit, according to a lawsuit filed with the U.S. District Court in San Francisco, California.

Apple accuses Mobile Star of selling Amazon counterfeit products that "pose an immediate threat to consumer safety."

Mobile Star's products are not subjected to industry-standard consumer safety testing and "are poorly constructed with inferior or missing components, flawed design and inadequate electrical insulation," the company alleges.

Groupon also sold Mobile Star's power products through its site. Amazon and Groupon are not listed as defendants in the lawsuit.

In a statement, Amazon said it has "zero tolerance for the sale of counterfeits on our site." The company said it works with closely with manufacturers and brands to stamp out fakes "and pursue wrongdoers aggressively.”

Mobile Star did not respond to BuzzFeed News' request for comment.

Apple claims Mobile Star's products can overheat, catch fire, and send a "deadly electric shock" to consumers during normal use.

Apple claims Mobile Star's products can overheat, catch fire, and send a "deadly electric shock" to consumers during normal use.

The products are presented on Amazon as shipped and sold by Amazon.com using Apple's own trademarks and images, the complaint says.

"Consumers are likewise unaware that the counterfeit Apple products that Amazon.com sourced from Mobile Star have not been safety certified or properly constructed," Apple alleges.

Even with Apple's efforts to stamp out fraudsters, fake product continues to flood the market, it said. Each month Apple "identifies and reports many thousands of listings for counterfeit and infringing Apple products to Amazon.com under its notice and takedown procedures."

A review by the company of more than 100 iPhone devices, power products, and Lightning cables sold as genuine on Amazon.com showed almost 90% of these were counterfeit.

Read the full complaint:




from BuzzFeed - Business http://ift.tt/2eFatON

Friday, October 14, 2016

These Moms Are Angry That Old Navy And Gap Call Kids "Husky" And "Plus" Size

Callie Gorgol

Gorgol, a 26-year-old mom who lives in Frederick, Maryland, typically shops in bulk at Old Navy for her six-year-old daughter and two-year-old son in the fall and the summer without any problem.

As she slid her cursor from the toddler to the girls section on the site, she noticed that two categories dropped down — slim and plus.

As she slid her cursor from the toddler to the girls section on the site, she noticed that two categories dropped down — slim and plus.

Old Navy / Via oldnavy.gap.com

She clicked on "plus" out of curiosity to discover that Old Navy considers girls' pants over size 8 to be "plus" size while boys are considered "husky" if they are over a size 10.

Gorgol, who also has a niece who is overweight due to medication she must take, was livid. She said it is "ridiculous" and unacceptable that "anyone would think it's ok to put 'plus' and 'husky' names to kids' clothing."

"I would never want them to think, 'Oh well, since I have to go in the plus section, I must be bigger I must be different than someone who is not shopping in plus,'" she said. "I want my children to grow up thinking they love their body. Everybody's body is different. That’s the way its supposed to be."

Gap Inc., which owns the Old Navy brand, did not respond to a request for comment.

There's plenty of debtate among plus-size models, and other critics of "plus size" like Amy Schumer, about whether the term is appropriate to describe adult bodies. But very little of the conversation has centered around the use of these labels for children.

@alessandragl / Via instagram.com

"Children who are overweight or obese are more vulnerable to body image and body esteem issues as well as psychological concerns," Vinita Menon, clinical psychologist and psychology instructor at Northern Illinois University, told BuzzFeed News. "Labeling of clothing that may be perceived as judgmental or pejorative has the potential to contribute to these concerns. The long-term focus should be multi-faceted — a focus on health and well-being along with supportive emotional coping strategies."

A recent study published in the Journal of Eating & Weight Disorders was the latest research to highlight the fragility of children's mental health when it comes to early discussions about weight and size.

The study, which surveyed over 500 young women, found that even well-intended comments from parents about their daughter’s weight may lead to a negative body image and unhealthy dieting behaviors in the long-term.

Egypt "Ify" Ufele, an 11-year-old fashion designer and anti-bullying activist, told BuzzFeed News she started ChubiiLine in 2015 after being bullied over her weight "to help other children to feel better about themselves."

Instagram: @bullychasers

She prefers to describe herself as a "curvy girl" and believes that "plus size" is not harmful to use in children's clothing.

"It doesn’t really bother me," said Ufele, whose line carries sizes 2T through 20. "'Curvy' is when you're comfortable with yourself. When people say you’re more chubbier than average then that’s what makes you feel uncomfortable about yourself."

Ufele said she accepted her weight after her doctors advised her that her asthma medication, which contains steroids, would lead to weight gain.

She had a hard time finding clothes so she began making her own. She believes that a "plus size" section for kids would broaden options for kids who wear larger sizes.

"It can make them feel bad about themselves because then we have a small section for them," she added. "But it can also make them feel good at the same time because then we have clothes other kids don't have."

Instagram: @mythriftedcloset

"For children to have to lead a movement to fight weight stigma is a tough battle for them to take on," said Bryn Austin, a professor of social and behavioral science at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. "I would rather just not expose them to that stigma and for them to be treated fairly and all children to know they're loved and valued at any size."

The reason that people are reclaiming the plus size label is to take back power and control over a name that has been used to denote a lower status in the social hierarchy, she said.

"What would be better is if we didn’t employ these methods of discrimination and shaming that create higher and lower statuses in community," she told BuzzFeed News. "How about we just have children be treated equal?"

Rasika Boice, a 34-year-old mother of an 11-month old girl in Jersey City, New Jersey, told BuzzFeed News that she thinks that this is "too young to be labeling kids plus size and can be potentially harmful."

Rasika Boice, a 34-year-old mother of an 11-month old girl in Jersey City, New Jersey, told BuzzFeed News that she thinks that this is "too young to be labeling kids plus size and can be potentially harmful."

Rasika Boice

Boice was also shocked to see that Old Navy categorized girls' clothing in "slim" and "plus" size while browsing through their site over the summer.

"In essence you’re saying girls who are plus and slim are irregular which just didn't seem right and seemed to have a lot of potential to hurt someone's self-esteem," she said. "When you’re a kid and being targeted as different, it could be scary."

She suggested kids sizes be labeled by number, rather than "plus" or "slim," because it's not as subjective.

"I don't think plus is a bad word," she said. "I don't think it’s the best term. We can do better than that term. I think it’s great that women are taking that term and embracing it and defining it for themselves and showcasing that beauty can come in many different shapes and sizes, but I still think it should be called something different."

"When you have children and they grow up and they see these celebrities, they‘re put in their mind they should look like Kim Kardashian or they should look like America’s next top model," she said. "They are so beaten up about what their bodies should look like. I think that’s just another additive to all the other things that are going on as far as body image as children."

LINK: These Beautiful Plus-Size Women Shut Down Every Hater In The Best Way

LINK: This Woman Was Fired From A Plus-Size Store For Using The Word “Fat”

LINK: Women Are Pissed Off With Boohoo For Charging More For A Plus-Size Dress

LINK: Amy Schumer Slams Magazine For Letting Young Girls Think She’s “Plus-Sized”

LINK: Amy Schumer Isn’t Cool With All These Body Labels




from BuzzFeed - Business http://ift.tt/2eeOL2a

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

These Homeopathic Teething Products May Have Led To 10 Deaths

As part of an ongoing investigation into homeopathic teething gels, marketed as "natural relief" for teething children and infants, the FDA has examined more than 400 reports of seizures, fever and vomiting, as well as 10 deaths, FDA spokesperson Lyndsay Meyer told BuzzFeed News on Wednesday.

The regulator does not know whether these deaths and illnesses — which happened over a six-year period — were caused by the products in question, but it is investigating the possibility.

"At this time, the FDA is still conducting our investigation, and we have not yet completed the analyses of products to determine if there is an association between the adverse events and the homeopathic teething products," she said.

The agency advised consumers to stop using homeopathic teething gels and tablets following a report of a child having a seizure after using the product.

The agency advised consumers to stop using homeopathic teething gels and tablets following a report of a child having a seizure after using the product.

CVS / Via m.cvs.com

After the FDA’s warning, CVS voluntarily removed all homeopathic teething products from their stores.

Hyland's said on Tuesday that it will discontinue distribution of its teething medicines in the US after the FDA's warning "created confusion among parents and limited access to the medicines."

"We are confident that any available Hyland’s teething products, including those you already have, are safe for use," the company added. "Of course, parents who may have concerns should consult with their physicians before using any medicines, read labels carefully and follow all instructions."

The FDA previously warned consumers about Hyland's in 2010 after analysis and testing showed some of its teething products contained varying amounts of belladonna, a potentially toxic ingredient.

The FDA previously warned consumers about Hyland's in 2010 after analysis and testing showed some of its teething products contained varying amounts of belladonna, a potentially toxic ingredient.

FDA / Via fda.gov

A preliminary review of the homeopathic teething tablets currently under warning "shows that these adverse events are similar to those observed in 2010," said Meyer.

The FDA and the American Academy of Pediatrics suggest gently rubbing or massaging a teething child’s gums to relieve pain or use a cool compress or teething ring.

LINK: Hey Parents, Maybe Don’t Give Your Babies Teething Tablets And Gels

LINK: The Truth About Amber Teething Necklaces

LINK: 200-Year-Old Homeopathy “Cures” May Face Modern Medical Testing




from BuzzFeed - Business http://ift.tt/2e9VJ9W

Tuesday, October 11, 2016

Inside The Breakup Of Formation 8, One Of Silicon Valley's Hottest VC Firms

Brian Koo often compared his business partnership with Joe Lonsdale to a marriage, and the two budding investors did seem an ideal match. Lonsdale is a prince of Silicon Valley, with a gold-plated Rolodex, while Koo, a scion of the LG business dynasty in South Korea, has access to the wealth and industrial networks of Asia.

The two men, who both attended Stanford, would chat about business ideas and possible investments, and Koo enjoyed his friend’s fast-talking style. While Koo has a reserved demeanor, Lonsdale gives off the impression that his mouth can’t keep up with his whirring brain. Lonsdale, a co-founder of the high-flying data analysis startup Palantir Technologies, helped Koo’s fledgling investment firm, Harbor Pacific Capital, gain access to Palantir shares. Later, when Koo was looking to open a hip Korean restaurant in downtown Palo Alto, Lonsdale would sign on as an investor in his friend’s passion project.

Sportsfile / Getty Images

In 2011, after several years of courtship, they agreed to tie the knot, joining forces to become Silicon Valley’s gatekeepers to Asia. Many American tech entrepreneurs have fantasized about China — a seeming promised land, with a vast consumer economy and the world’s biggest population of internet users — and many dreams have been dashed by homegrown competition, friction with the government, or a misunderstanding of the culture. But Koo and Lonsdale’s dream was particularly bold: They pledged to start a venture capital firm that would conquer Asia not once, but repeatedly, on behalf of the US startups they invested in. Their firm, Formation 8, which they started with a third partner, Jim Kim, raised nearly $1 billion in capital and soon became known as a top player, with prescient bets on startups including the virtual reality company Oculus VR.

But the San Francisco–based firm’s ultimate breakup last November — the story behind which has never previously been reported — shows how challenging it was to connect these two business worlds separated by the Pacific. Koo failed in a costly attempt to help a major startup backed by Formation 8, the $3 billion e-commerce app Wish, establish a presence in Asia. And sexual assault allegations filed against Lonsdale in early 2015, which he strongly denied, opened a painful rift with Koo’s father — a leading Korean industrialist and key investor in the fund.

After the Wish failure, Lonsdale expressed doubts about Koo’s efforts in Asia, and Koo, keen to add Asian companies to Formation 8’s portfolio, questioned whether Lonsdale was fully committed to his vision for investing there. But the sexual assault lawsuit brought these simmering tensions to a boil.

When the lawsuit landed, Koo was taken aback, and he confronted his partner to ask why he hadn’t been given advance warning, according to people with direct knowledge of the matter. Koo’s father, John, a prominent figure in a culture where public reputation and family honor are paramount, viewed the Lonsdale case as a stain on the family’s reputation. As the legal fight dragged on, Koo came under immense pressure from his father and others in his circle to distance himself from Lonsdale.

The disintegration of Formation 8 was officially attributed to a divergence in investing styles among the founding partners, and the three men have each set up new investment firms with distinct goals. But a BuzzFeed News investigation, based on internal documents and interviews with 14 people who worked at the firm or were close to its founders, has revealed that the firm’s breakup is yet another entry in a long list — one that includes efforts by Microsoft, Google, Groupon, and, most recently, Uber — of thwarted attempts to bring Silicon Valley and Asia together.

Koo, in an email to BuzzFeed News, suggested that the divorce had caused personal strain.

“There were critical things for me when I decided to separate from Joe and put Formation 8 into history,” Koo, who is 36, said in the email. “I went through a tough time only to keep integrity in my life.”

Later, after a discussion with Lonsdale, Koo sent another email to BuzzFeed News and looped in his former partner.

“We learned a lot and shared a lot of success over five intense years and are very proud of what we accomplished,” Koo said in that subsequent email. He said Formation 8 broke up “based on what we learned about our investing styles and areas of focus.”

“Joe and I worked so much together raising a first-time fund and we share great memories from that work which will remain with us for a very long time,” Koo added. He said he and Lonsdale “remain not only good friends but allies in our current endeavors.”

Lonsdale, 34, said in an emailed reply that he had no further comment “other than to concur with Brian.”

The third partner, Kim, who is 38, said in a separate emailed statement that he was “proud of what we accomplished so quickly in becoming one of the top venture firms in Silicon Valley. As we each move to the next phase of our careers, I will cheer for my partners and I'm excited to continue building great companies.”

While Koo and Lonsdale tasted disappointment in venture capital, their luck in the restaurant business hasn’t been any better. Their attempt to open a Korean eatery in the vacant building in Palo Alto that once housed Silicon Valley’s first Apple store — where Steve Jobs selected some of the interior tile — has been mired in municipal red tape. Today, nearly three years after the restaurant proposal was submitted to the city, the onetime Jobsian temple where Koo pays monthly rent is a forlorn relic, with a dark curtain blacking out its glass facade.

Formation 8 started, as many a Silicon Valley scheme does, with a lot of hype. A Fortune article in 2013 described the Formation 8 founders as “the hottest VCs since Andreessen,” referring to the venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (which is an investor in BuzzFeed). Lonsdale, a protégé of the billionaire investor Peter Thiel, had become famous in his own right, and he had insider access to the network of engineers and entrepreneurs who had worked at Palantir. Koo, whose father ran the LS Group, an industrial offshoot of LG, showed the breadth of his connections in the Korean business world when he got the K-pop star Psy — remember “Gangnam Style”? — to meet with Formation 8’s startups in Silicon Valley.

While Lonsdale’s formidable network drove headlines in the US, Formation 8’s secret weapon was always the chaebol, or business conglomerate, controlled by the Koo family. South Korea’s chaebols — including global giants like LG, Samsung, and Hyundai — were formed over half a century ago and are the pillars of the country’s economy. Brian Koo’s extended family controls LG, and his father is the former head of LS, a spinoff that produces cable, electrical equipment, and heavy machinery. Chieftains such as John Koo, descended from the chaebol founders, are like royalty in Korea, even in the face of recent scandals.

To cut his teeth in the economy of the future, Brian Koo left Seoul as a young man and went to Stanford, collecting an undergraduate degree in economics and staying to attend business school. (A thesis paper he wrote discussed how Korean companies could expand into China.) In 2010, as newly minted MBAs, Koo and two business school classmates started a venture capital firm, Harbor Pacific, raising between $40 million and $50 million in capital. Their stated goals included helping American startups find business opportunities in Asia, and helping Asian ones break into the US. That year, Lonsdale helped them buy Palantir stock.

But Koo soon left Harbor Pacific to create what was essentially a bigger expression of the same idea. In June 2011, despite having made a multiyear commitment to Harbor Pacific and its investors, Koo secured a new promise of capital from the LS Group, with plans to start a separate fund, according to a confidential fund document and people familiar with the matter. His two partners, alarmed by what they saw as a conflict of interest, insisted that Koo leave Harbor Pacific. He was out as a full-time partner by the end of 2011, starting at Formation 8 in the new year.

Mirroring the Koo family’s expertise in the energy sector, Formation 8 set out to raise a $500 million fund focused on clean technology and infrastructure investments, a confidential pitch deck from that time shows. (Later, the scope was broadened to include business software and e-commerce.) Koo recruited Jim Kim, who was a partner at the venture firm Khosla Ventures and had a track record in investing in energy technology.

Lonsdale — once an intern at PayPal and later an executive at Peter Thiel’s hedge fund, Clarium Capital — was prized for his “famous SV network,” the Formation 8 pitch deck says, using initials for Silicon Valley. Along with Thiel and others, Lonsdale had helped start Palantir, which today has a $20 billion valuation. While perhaps too junior to be considered a true member of the “PayPal mafia” — the group of former PayPal employees who went on to found or lead tech giants including YouTube, Tesla, LinkedIn, and Yelp — Lonsdale was “friends with many of the founders of the companies that came out of PayPal,” the deck notes.

LS committed to invest $50 million into Formation 8, as an anchor investment to get the fund started, according to confidential fund documents. To compensate LS for taking an early chance on the fund, it was promised a cut of the profit collected by the fund managers, in addition to any gains on the capital it invested, a private placement memorandum shows. (Such an arrangement is not unusual for anchor investors, who play a crucial role in helping first-time venture capitalists raise a fund.) Formation 8 announced in April 2013 that it had raised $448 million, just shy of the initial target.

John Koo, Brian’s father, was chairman of Formation 8’s strategic advisory board. The powerful South Korean industrialist was also one of the group of eight original members after which the firm was named. LS, which he ran at the time, would “offer tremendous market penetration and contacts in Asia,” the pitch deck says. Such access would be central to the firm’s strategy, which, according to the deck, was to “invest in U.S. technologies and help companies establish business in Asia.”

As proof of its ability to realize its founding vision, Formation 8 could hardly have asked for better than its work linking Oculus, the hottest American startup in the white-hot world of virtual reality, with the Korean electronics giant Samsung.

Oculus was small — it had recently raised money through a Kickstarter campaign — but it was quickly earning a reputation in tech circles as a breakthrough company in the making. After investing in mid-2013, Lonsdale and Koo took a private jet together to the startup’s headquarters in Irvine, California, to double down on their bet through a second funding round. In San Francisco, Koo had organized an introductory event for Samsung executives at Formation 8’s office, helping Oculus establish a manufacturing partnership with the Korean conglomerate. Samsung and Oculus would go on to release Gear VR, a landmark virtual reality headset for the mass market.

Oculus’s early success didn’t go unnoticed by the tech establishment, and in March 2014, Facebook bought the startup for $2 billion. It was a massive payday for Formation 8 — and, perhaps even more importantly, it sent a signal to Silicon Valley that the young firm had arrived. Formation 8 recorded an 84% internal rate of return in its first fund as of the end of December 2015, putting it among the top funds of its class, according to two people with knowledge of the matter.

A visitor wearing an Oculus Rift headset at the Tokyo Game Show 2016

Tomohiro Ohsumi / Getty Images

But even as Oculus was rising, another important test of Formation 8’s investment thesis was quickly turning into a disaster. Wish, a scrappy challenger to Amazon, was prized for its artificial intelligence technology, which analyzes a customer’s purchase behavior to deliver tailored product recommendations. Koo, Lonsdale, and Kim had personally invested in the startup behind the Wish app, ContextLogic, according to two people familiar with the matter, and transferred those stakes to Formation 8’s first fund. They viewed Peter Szulczewski, the former Google engineer who was the ContextLogic CEO, as an especially important entrepreneur in their portfolio.

“We just cannot screw up with Peter,” Lonsdale would tell Koo, according to someone with direct knowledge of the matter.

To help Szulczewski establish a presence in Asia, Formation 8 proposed the creation of a Korean joint venture, a new entity financed with capital from both Formation 8 and ContextLogic. This gave Formation 8, which already had a piece of Wish, a direct stake in the startup’s foray into Asia. The joint venture, called ContextLogic Korea, was based in the same building as Formation 8’s Seoul office, with the two logos side by side on an office wall, a photograph obtained by BuzzFeed News shows.

Screenshot of the Wish app.

Wish

But Szulczewski was reluctant to give ContextLogic Korea access to the Wish technology, instead preferring to crunch the Korean data in San Francisco and send the results back to Seoul, two people familiar with the matter said. This approach frustrated the ContextLogic Korea engineers, who began building their own app, with their own algorithms, the people said. When Szulczewski finally visited the Seoul office, he became furious with the engineers’ efforts to create what was essentially an inferior imitation of Wish, according to four people with knowledge of the matter. One person who spoke with Szulczewski at that time said the Wish CEO viewed the Korean product as a competitor.

Koo oversaw this effort and apologized to the engineers in Seoul after its failure. ContextLogic Korea later changed its name to Style Shop, with a new website registered in May 2015, domain records show. But that website, which displayed information about a shopping app as recently as April, is currently blank. At least three engineers and the entity’s CEO no longer work there, LinkedIn profiles show. Members of Wish management did not respond to numerous requests for comment.

The frustrations surrounding the Wish project and other efforts came to a head at a December 2013 meeting at Lonsdale’s house in Woodside, a leafy enclave south of San Francisco. Formation 8 employees, including some who had flown in from Korea, China, and Singapore, made their way down the long, tree-lined driveway to the house’s marble foyer, continuing to the sunken living room and the dining room with its long table and high-backed chairs. A white board had been rolled in for the occasion.

Lonsdale, his hurried speech containing a note of agitation, told Koo and his reports from Asia that he was disappointed with their struggles to make progress there, according to people who were present. While Lonsdale had expressed similar sentiments previously, doing so in front of the entire firm was unusual, the people said. With Koo and his team absorbing the lecture, Lonsdale questioned whether Formation 8 should be committing so much money to their projects in Asia, according to contemporaneous notes taken by someone who was there.

As Formation 8 began raising a second fund, Koo said he wanted to invest in Asian startups at a later stage of their growth, a departure from the strategy of betting on younger American startups. But Lonsdale expressed reservations, according to people familiar with the matter. Formation 8 did end up investing in two Korean startups, including the $4 billion mobile apps company Yello Mobile, and Koo set out to raise a special fund for later-stage deals in Asia. But Koo got the sense that his partner was less interested than he was in pursuing this vision.

Every venture capital firm has its share of business missteps, and the ones at Formation 8 were not enough to splinter the firm. But the lawsuit filed in early 2015 by Lonsdale’s ex-girlfriend, Elise Clougherty, accusing him of sexually assaulting her repeatedly during their relationship, plunged the firm into crisis.

On the evening of Jan. 27, 2015, Formation 8 celebrated its three-year anniversary with an elegant, mood-lit bash in San Francisco’s South of Market neighborhood. Later that night, a small group went to the house of Drew Oetting, Lonsdale’s chief of staff, for an unofficial afterparty. Kim was the only founding partner to make it that far, and his evening soon took a turn for the worse. He got a call from Lonsdale, who broke the news that Clougherty — a woman eight years Lonsdale’s junior, whom he had mentored while she was an undergraduate at Stanford — had given her assault claims the force of a lawsuit.



from BuzzFeed - Business http://ift.tt/2e5b769

Friday, September 30, 2016

Here's What's Really In The Kardashians' Favorite Hair Vitamins

But the gummy-bear vitamins still earned an overall A-grade for having the amount of vitamins and minerals a person needs to compensate for nutrient deficiencies that affect hair growth, said Labdoor.

Labdoor, a San Francisco-based lab that tests and grades dietary supplements, found that the listed quantities of 7 of the 11 nutrients listed on the SugarBearHair were inaccurate by 20% or more. It also found the vitamins had “relatively high” levels of lead compared with other hair supplements tested by the lab.

“We’re definitely striving for more accurate label claims,” said Dan Mark, research director for Labdoor, to BuzzFeed News. “Any inaccuracies to us are penalized.”

While still a relatively young company — it registered as a Florida-based business in May 2015 — SugarBearHair and its little blue gummy vitamins have become well known to social media users, thanks in large part to promotion on Instagram by celebrities like Kylie Jenner, Kim Kardashian, and Khloe Kardashian.

"These chewable gummy vitamins are delicious and a favorite part of my hair care routine"

Instagram: @kimkardashian

SugarBearHair, which manufactures the vitamin in California, told BuzzFeed News that the company has “well over 100 lab test results performed by accredited independent laboratories” that show the product is “well within” Food and Drug Administration and California guidelines.

“We are committed to manufacturing safe and effective products,” said a representative for the company. “The lab testing shows our vitamin’s safety and quality is above and beyond industry standards. The amount of each vitamin more than meets the FDA’s CFR Part 111’s dosage requirements to ensure SugarBearHair’s label accuracy.”

Labdoor’s testing found the bears contain 70% more biotin than claimed on the label and about 75% the amount of vitamins B5 and B6, which have been associated with hair growth. The gummies also contain about 26% less Vitamin E than what the company claims on the label.

@sugarbearhair / Via Instagram: @sugarbearhair

Arthur Grollman, a professor and director of Stony Brook University School of Medicine’s Laboratory for Chemical Biology, told BuzzFeed News that the vitamin’s label inaccuracy “reflects the lack of regulations” of the dietary supplement industry, which is not held to the same strict government standards as the pharmaceutical business.

“I would expect complete label accuracy from all dietary supplement manufacturers,” said Grollman. “Some of these things are toxic in excess and [consumers] ought to know what they’re putting in their mouth. If the label is not accurate, it could be toxic to them.”

Labdoor measured 8,497 micrograms of biotin in one serving the gummies, 70% more than claimed on the label; 10.3 micrograms of B12, 72% more than on the label; and 3.5 micrograms of B6, 73% more than the label.

All B vitamins, including biotin, are water soluble, which means the body will naturally excrete any unused nutrients, according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH). That means having an excess of B vitamins and biotin does not necessarily make the vitamin more effective because the body will release any amounts it doesn’t use, said Mark.

But at the same time he said that having an excess of B vitamins and biotin does not necessarily make the vitamin unsafe because the body will release any amounts it doesn't use.

Research collected by the NIH suggests adequate intakes for biotin are 25 micrograms for adolescents 14 to 18 years old and 30 micrograms for adults over 18 years old.

Here are the test results from LabDoor

Here are the test results from LabDoor

Labdoor

Labdoor also found the blue gummy bears had “relatively high” lead levels. The tests found 0.075 ppm of lead in a serving size of two vitamins, which is below the federally recommended maximum level of 0.1 ppm in candy consumed by small children. But while the company recommends eating two of its vitamin chews per day, Labdoor says its test results show that eating just one more than the recommended dosage would cause users to exceed California’s Maximum Allowable Dose Levels.

Those levels, referring to individual dosages contained in products, are far below what researchers estimate is the overall average daily intake of lead, a naturally occurring element that is present in trace amounts in water and throughout the food system. The FDA has estimated adult women can tolerate a total intake of 75 micrograms of lead per day; for young children it estimates the limit at less than a tenth of that.

California limits individual dosages in a product to 0.5 micrograms, and Labdoor’s results found two SugarBearHair gummies contained 0.38 micrograms, with a third tipping the dosage over the California limit.

Mark warned that while some people might be tempted to eat more than two a day because the vitamins “taste like gummy bears,” users “definitely need to check exactly what's in a supplement before using it.”

“Levels of heavy metals and other contaminants are not going to be reported on labels,” he said.

Duffy MacKay, senior vice president of scientific and regulatory affairs with the supplement industry group Center for Responsible Nutrition, told BuzzFeed News that it’s common to see discrepancies between a label and the actual content of a supplement.

“If you come at this expecting every vitamin to be spot on every time it’s tested you’re going to be shocked if you see this variability,” he said. “These are vitamins and minerals. They’re natural compounds with natural variability. There is also degradation.”

It’s not “uncommon for manufacturers to put a little bit of overage,” he said. Vitamins and minerals naturally degrade over time and that process can be accelerated by exposure to light and other nutrients, he said.

Instagram: @kyliejenner

The FDA, which regulates dietary supplements, does not require companies to get the agency’s approval of their product before going to market, agency spokesperson Lyndsay Meyer told BuzzFeed News.

Companies do, however, need to register as a manufacturer with the agency, adhere to good manufacturing practices, and meet labeling requirements. They must also meet the agency’s standards for nutrient claims. But with a staff of less than 24 people to regulate an industry worth an estimated $36.7 billion, the agency has focused its resources on cracking down on unsafe products, said Meyer.

Grollman said the FDA has “so many bad actors and so many toxic supplements” in the industry that “they would never check this.”

“Lead is not safe at any level,” said Grollman. “There is no way those pure vitamins could or should have lead. Just because California voters put a number on it it doesn’t mean it’s safe. I would not take anything that has lead in it.”


LINK: The Anti-Aging Supplement Gold Mine

LINK: Retailers Pull Herbal Supplements Following Accusations Of Contamination And False Advertising

LINK: Over-The-Counter Weight Loss Supplement Contains Prozac

LINK: Yet Another Amphetamine-Like Drug Found In Dietary Supplements

LINK: Two People May Have Died Because Of This Lead-Contaminated Supplement




from BuzzFeed - Business http://ift.tt/2dLb2bA

Wednesday, September 14, 2016

The Top Rated National Landmark In The US May Not Be What You Think It Is

People have some strong opinions about national landmarks and historical buildings in the US. One person called the Library of Congress a "letdown" in a one-star review. Another one-star review described the Statue of Liberty as "an eyesore with no aesthetic value."

People have some strong opinions about national landmarks and historical buildings in the US. One person called the Library of Congress a "letdown" in a one-star review. Another one-star review described the Statue of Liberty as "an eyesore with no aesthetic value."

Yelp data provided to BuzzFeed News actually shows that, among 108 million reviews, the nation's local fire departments, followed by landmarks and historical buildings, get the highest number of stars.

Passport and visa services, libraries, and skate parks are also in the top five categories with the highest ratings on Yelp.

Yelp only publishes rankings rounded up to a half-star. But using data broken down to a few tenths of a point, BuzzFeed News was able to determine how the landmarks ranked within the five-star bracket.

Of all the nation's landmarks, White Sands National Monument in Alamogordo, New Mexico, took the top spot, with the highest average five-star rating, according to Yelp data.

Of all the nation's landmarks, White Sands National Monument in Alamogordo, New Mexico, took the top spot, with the highest average five-star rating, according to Yelp data.

AP Photo/Patrick Semansky

The monument has racked up 177 reviews by users who wrote they felt like they were "on the moon" while walking through the sweeping white sand dunes.

Still, there are a speckling of unhappy campers, including one person who described it as "just a bunch of sand dunes that happen to be white."

Here's the top five-star landmarks, ranked according to the non-rounded data provided to BuzzFeed News.

Missing from the top five-star list are some of the country's biggest tourist sites, including the Golden Gate Bridge and Statue of Liberty, which have average 4.5-star ratings, and the Liberty Bell, which has a 4-star rating.

The data comes a year after Yelp and the Government Services Administration signed a terms of services agreement to allow agencies and offices to engage with people over the platform.

The data comes a year after Yelp and the Government Services Administration signed a terms of services agreement to allow agencies and offices to engage with people over the platform.

AP/Richard Vogel

"The information that is produced is organic," Laurent Crenshaw, government relations director with Yelp, told BuzzFeed News. "The connection is generally richer, more thorough, and it lists numerous details about that agency if they are really attempting to improve their service."

Yelp data shows that landmarks, historical buildings, libraries, DMV offices, and post offices are the most engaged government agencies on the site, which means they've claimed the highest number of pages and regularly engage with reviewers.

"Whenever citizens can easily and meaningfully provide feedback in public services, we can use that to help make the customer experience faster, better and more cost efficient," Justin Herman, the manager of the Government Services Administration's Digital Communities and Open Government programs, told BuzzFeed News.

AP Photo/Richard Vogel

DMVs, courthouses, police departments, tax offices, and post offices continue to log the lowest scores with no higher than an average 3.5-star rating, according to Yelp.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) checkpoints also have generally low ratings, however, the agency told Politico last year that it prefers to use Twitter to engage with people.

The TSA has so far only claimed its headquarters page, which has a two-star rating and 37 reviews. It declined to comment or provide additional detail to BuzzFeed News.



from BuzzFeed - Business http://ift.tt/2cIRfKb

Women Are Saying This L'Oréal Relaxer Made Their Hair Fall Out And Left Their Scalps Burning

Two women have accused L'Oréal USA of fraud and negligence in a class-action lawsuit filed on Wednesday after they say they felt burning on their scalps and developed bald spots after using the brand's SoftSheen-Carson Optimum Amla Legend relaxer.

Two women have accused L'Oréal USA of fraud and negligence in a class-action lawsuit filed on Wednesday after they say they felt burning on their scalps and developed bald spots after using the brand's SoftSheen-Carson Optimum Amla Legend relaxer.

Amazon.com / Via amazon.com

SoftSheen and Carson have been L'Oréal brands since 1999. The brand claims to offer "the safest and most effective beauty products for our consumers," according to its website.

SoftSheen and Carson have been L'Oréal brands since 1999. The brand claims to offer "the safest and most effective beauty products for our consumers," according to its website.

L'Oreal USA / Via lorealusa.com

The relaxer promises consumers that the product uses "a legendary Indian beauty secret: AMLA oil," which will help "reveal visibly fuller, silkier hair," according to the suit.

The relaxer promises consumers that the product uses "a legendary Indian beauty secret: AMLA oil," which will help "reveal visibly fuller, silkier hair," according to the suit.

Amazon.com / Via amazon.com


But Dorothy Riles, a plaintiff in the suit, experienced the opposite of what the company promised, according to the lawsuit. After using the relaxer, she said she felt her scalp burning and was left with bald patches and scabs on her scalp. She claims she wore a wig to cover the damage.

But Dorothy Riles, a plaintiff in the suit, experienced the opposite of what the company promised, according to the lawsuit. After using the relaxer, she said she felt her scalp burning and was left with bald patches and scabs on her scalp. She claims she wore a wig to cover the damage.

Geragos & Geragos, Levi & Korsinsky / Via documentcloud.org

"The ingredients in the product are very harmful," Lori Feldman, an attorney with Levi & Korsinsky, which is representing the plaintiffs in the suit, told BuzzFeed News. "This product is advertised as having amla oil that will help, but it's trumped many times over by very harmful toxic chemicals."

The product contains a number of potentially irritating ingredients, including lithium hydroxide, hexylene glycol, butylene glycol, cocamidopropyl betaine, and fragrance, according to the complaint.

"What you're really getting is a garbage dump of chemicals that cannot possibly do what L'Oreal promises to do," said Feldman.

A number of other consumers have taken to review sites like Amazon.com to warn other women about the product.

A number of other consumers have taken to review sites like Amazon.com to warn other women about the product.

Amazon.com / Via amazon.com

One reviewer said they had "never experienced burns like the burns from this product."

Another person said their 26-year-old daughter was crying because "her hair is gone." She said she followed the directions, but "now she has no hair on the sides or back of her head."

L'Oréal did not immediately return a request for comment from BuzzFeed News on the allegations.

SoftSheen-Carson ads have featured celebrities like Kelly Rowland and celebrity stylists like Johnny Wright.

SoftSheen-Carson ads have featured celebrities like Kelly Rowland and celebrity stylists like Johnny Wright.

Aurélie Extiff / Via youtube.com

Michelle Obama, reality TV personality Cynthia Bailey, and several other celebrities attended the brand's Optimum Salon Haircare AMLA Legend product launch in 2013, according to a press release.

Beyoncé has also been featured in L'Oréal makeup and hair color commercials.

Read the full complaint:




from BuzzFeed - Business http://ift.tt/2cYWVMN